Define . When
define
. This is a consistent definition since if
and
then
and so there is an isomorphism
. If
then by the pigeonhole principle two numbers are assigned the same number, which is not possible and therefore
. Dually
. Hence
. When
is an infinite set, define
.
lemma: when is a list of disjoint finite sets, then
.
The statement is true when . Assume it to be true for a given
and let
be a sequence of disjoint finite sets. Let
. Then there are isomorphisms
and
. Define
by
. Then
is an isomorphism and so
.
lemma: when then
.
If is infinite, then
is infinite and
. If
is infinite, then
. When both
are finite then by prior result,
.
lemma: If is a collection of sets, then
is a measure on
.
It is a non-negative function such that . To establish this as measure countable additivity has to be verified. Let
be a sequence of disjoint subsets of
.
Either for all
or there is an
such that
.
If there is an such that
then
since a set that contains an infinite set is infinite.
Suppose for all
. Either
or
. In the first case, an infinite number of sets
are nonempty and so
. In the second case, all but finitely many sets are nonempty and
.
