This is a review of part of chapter 2 of Rudin’s introductory book on principle of mathematical analysis.
Metric
A metric on a set is a function
such that
iff
.
A metric space is a pair where
is a set and
is a metric on
. A ball is a subset of the form
. This set identifies all points of distance smaller than
from
.
Classification of points in the space can be made on the basis of certain properties. Let be a subset of
- a neighbourhood of
is a ball
where
.
is a limit point of
if every neighbourhood of
contains a point of
distinct from
.
is a point of closure of
if it is a point of
or is a limit point of
.
is an isolated point of
if it is a point of closure that is not limit point of
.
is an interior point of
if there is a neighbourhood of
contained in
.
Classification of sets
is closed if every limit point of
is a point of
.
is open if every point of
is an interior point of
.
is perfect if every point of
is a limit point of
and every limit point of
is a point of
.
is dense in
if every point of
is a point of closure of
.
lemma: neighbourhoods are open sets.
proof: Let . Since
implies
, it follows that
, it follows that
is an interior point of
.
lemma: if is a limit point of
, then every neighbourhood of
contains an infinite number of points of
.
proof: Let be a given neighbourhood of
. Since
is a limit point of
there is a point
such that
. Then
. Assume distinct points
of
have been selected and such that
for
. Choose
such that
and
. Then
defines a sequence of distinct points of
distinct from
and has an infinite range.
corollary: a finite set has no limit points
proof: if it did then any neighbourhood of one of its limit points contains an infinite number of points of . But
is a finite set and so does not have an infinite number of points.
lemma: a set is open iff its complement is closed.
proof:
Suppose is an open set. Suppose
is not closed. Then there is a limit point
of $E^C$ that is a point of
. But every point of
is an interior point of
, and so there is a neighbourhood of
contained in
. But by the prior lemma, every neighbourhood of a limit point of
contains an infinite number of points of
, which is false. So
is closed.
Conversely, let is closed. Suppose that
is not open. Then there is a point of
that is not an interior point of
. And so for every neighbourhood of $x$ there is a point of $E^C$ contained in it. Since this point is distinct from
, it follows that
is limit point of
. But since
is closed, it contains all its limit points and so
, which is false. Hence
is open.
theorem [set properties of open/closed sets]
- let
be a collection of open sets. Then
is an open set
- let
be a collection of closed sets. Then
is a closed set
- let
be a finite collection of open sets. Then
is an open set
- let
be a finite collection of closed sets. Then
is a closed set
proof:
Let is a collection of open sets. Let
. Then there is an open set
such that
. But since every point of
is an interior point of
there is a neighbourhood
of
contained in
. But since
is a subset of
it follows that
is an interior point of
. Hence every point of $\cup F$ is an interior point of
and so
is open.
Let be a collection of closed sets. Then
is the complement of the union of a collection of open sets, nd therefore is a closed set.
For the latter cases, it is sufficient to consider two sets and appeal to mathematical induction to establish the general property.
Let be open sets. Let
. Then
is point of
and therefore an interior point of
. Hence there is a ball
contained in
. Analgously, there is a ball
contained in
. So
is a ball contained in
. Hene
is an interior point of the intersection and therefore an open set.
Let be closed sets. Then
is the complement of the intersection of open sets and therefore is a closed set.
lemma: let denote the set of points of closure of
. Then
is a closed set
iff
is closed
is the smallest closed set containing
.
proof:
Let be a limit point of
. Suppose that
is not a point of
. Then it is not a point of
and it is not a limit point of
. Hence there is a neighbourhood of
that contains no points of
. But since
is a limit point of
every neighborhood of
contains a point of
and so contains a point of
. But this is false. Hence
is a point of
. Since this applies to every limit point,
is a closed set.
Let . Then by the prior result,
is a closed set. Conversely, suppose
is a closed set. Then every limit point of
is a point of
, and so
.
Let be a closed set containing
. Let $x$ be a limit point of
. Then every neighbourhood of $x$ contains a point of
and therefore
. Hence
is a limit point of
. But since
is closed,
is a point of
. Hence
contains all the limit points of
, and so it contains the closure of
. Hence the intersection of all closed sets containing
also contains the closure of
. But the intersection of a collection of closed sets is a closed set and since the closure of
is contained in this collection, it follows that the closure of
is equal to the intersection of all closed sets containing
and so is the smallest such set.
definition: a subspace of the metric space
is the metric space
.
lemma: A set is open in metric space
iff there is an set
open in
such that
.
proof: Suppose that where
is an open set of
.Let
. Then there is
. But then $B_Y(x,r) = B(x,r) \cap Y$ is a neighbourhood of
in the space
, and is such that $B_Y(x,r) \subseteq O$. Hence
is open in
.
Conversely, suppose that is an open set of the space
. Then for each point
there is a
. Define
. Then
is an open set of
and is such that
. But the RHS is both contained in
and contains
and so is identical to
. Hence
.
Compact Sets
definition: An cover for a set is a collection of sets whose union contains
. An open cover is a cover comprised of open sets. A subcover is a subset of cover that is a cover.
definition: a subset of a metric space
is compact if every open cover of
has a finite subcover.
lemma: suppose . Then
is compact in space
iff it is compact in space
.
proof: suppose is compact in space
. Let
be an open cover of
in space
. Then each set
has an open set
in space
such that
. But then
is an open cover of
in space
. Since
is compact in this space, it has a finite subcover
. But then
is a finite subcover of
. Hence
is compact in space
.
Conversely, suppose is compact in space
. Let
be an open cover of
in space
. Then $C_Y = \{O \cap Y : O \in C\}$ is an open cover of
in space
and so has a finite subcover. But this implies that
has a finite subcover. Hence
is compact in space
.
lemma: compact sets of metric spaces are closed.
proof: Let be a compact subset of the metric space
. Let
be a point in
. For
,
and so there are disjoint neighbourhoods
of
and
of
. Since
is an open cover of
, there is a finite sequence
such that
. is a subcover. But then
and so
. Hence
, and so $x$ is an interior point of
. Hence
is open, and so its complement
is closed.
lemma: closed subsets of compact sets are compact
proof: Let be a closed subset of the compact set
. Let
be an open cover of
. Then
is open and
is an open cover of
and therefore of
, and so there is a finite subcover of
. But this implies there is a finite subcover of
. Hence
is compact.
corollary: if is closed and
is compact then
is compact.
proof: since is a closed subset of the compact set
, it follows that it is compact.
theorem: If is a collection of compact sets such that every finite subcollection has a nonempty intersection,
is nonempty.
proof: Suppose that is empty. Then
with the LHS being the union of a collection of complements of compact sets and therefore a collection of open sets. Choose any
. Then since
is compact, there is a finite subcover of
. Hence $k \subseteq k_1^C \cup \ldots k_n^C$. But this implies that $k \cap k_1 \cap \ldots k_n = \emptyset$, which is false. So the supposition is false.
corollary: If is a non-increasing sequence of nonempty compact sets, then
is noempty.
proof: the intersection of every finite subcollection contains the compact sets with the largest index and since every set in the collection is nonempty, the intersection is nonempty. So the intersection is nonempty.
lemma: If is an infinite subset of compact set
then
contains a limit point of
.
proof: suppose contains no limit point of
. Then every point of
has a neighbourhood that contains at most one point of
. This is an open cover of
, and so has a finite subcover. But this implies
has a finite subcover. But a finite subcover of this collection only covers a finite number of points of
, which is a contradiction. So the initial supposition is false.
